Forums
|
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » | |
| homefront? | ||
|
Moderator(s): SiteAdmin, WizLoco, ANTONOVKGB, GetaLife[KGB], impcfast, yellowmanKGB, Thorn, Boogiemnstr
|
| Author | Post | ||
| LegionKGB |
|
||
Registered Member #151
Joined: Thu Mar 10 2011, 03:59AMPosts: 30 |
anyone gonna jump on this game? multiplayer is as good as battlefield.... | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| yellowmanKGB |
|
||
yellowmankgb
Registered Member #20
Joined: Mon Nov 23 2009, 05:26PMPosts: 387 |
i have it but i have not played multiplayer yet. playing single right now | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Series |
|
||
Registered Member #16
Joined: Sun Nov 22 2009, 07:24PMPosts: 235 |
heard it wasn't very good. its the sequel to frontlines but they didn't keep the name since frontlines was considered a failure | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Mooch |
|
||
Registered Member #5
Joined: Sun Nov 08 2009, 03:59AMPosts: 263 |
Series wrote ... heard it wasn't very good. its the sequel to frontlines but they didn't keep the name since frontlines was considered a failure What he said. I don't have it nor am I going to get it, cause I heard it was pretty bad. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| LegionKGB |
|
||
Registered Member #151
Joined: Thu Mar 10 2011, 03:59AMPosts: 30 |
The single player is short and kinda lame. Thats what most of the poor reviews were about. The mutiplayer isn't that bad. I'm Just burnt out on bad company. Yellow, after you beat the single, play the multi. It wont take you long to wrap up the single player anyway. Edited Sat Mar 19 2011, 02:23PM | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| yellowmanKGB |
|
||
yellowmankgb
Registered Member #20
Joined: Mon Nov 23 2009, 05:26PMPosts: 387 |
I finished the single player in like 3 hours. Multiplayer is not to bad. The maps are kind of large for the number of players though. It is kinda fun though but it is hard to say playing by myself. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Antilogic81KGB |
|
||
Registered Member #17
Joined: Sun Nov 22 2009, 11:27PMPosts: 355 |
yellowmanKGB wrote ... I finished the single player in like 3 hours. Multiplayer is not to bad. The maps are kind of large for the number of players though. It is kinda fun though but it is hard to say playing by myself. Storyline is pretty good for an FPS all things considered...it doesn't follow the standard covert ops, afganistan, world war 2 stuff that seem to permeate every shooter these days. I do enjoy the multiplayer. It's far and away much better then the dev's previous title Frontlines. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| WizLoco |
|
||
Registered Member #2
Joined: Tue Oct 27 2009, 05:19PMPosts: 232 |
is the game worth the the price? i tried the xbox360(rented game). the single player looked fun...not able to play multplayer...no servers available at the time...also dont like controls...need kb/ mouse |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Antilogic81KGB |
|
||
Registered Member #17
Joined: Sun Nov 22 2009, 11:27PMPosts: 355 |
WizLoco wrote ... is the game worth the the price? i tried the xbox360(rented game). the single player looked fun...not able to play multplayer...no servers available at the time...also dont like controls...need kb/ mouse In short no I don't think so. If you can get it for less then the full retail price it might be worth it. Multiplayer is fun but there is one thing that hampers the experience...th ere are only 7 maps. I'm really confused as to why game developers are forced to make concessions like almost no maps for multiplayer. Does THQ really think that if it starves it's consumer base with a lack of maps it can squeeze more cash out of them with map DLCs? |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| mackrevis |
|
||
Registered Member #4
Joined: Fri Oct 30 2009, 08:54AMPosts: 146 |
Meh, sticking with Black OPs on 360. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
Welcome
Poll
Will you be playing Battlefield 6
Yes
No
Online
- Guests: 2
- Members: 0
- Newest Member: Hexaholic
-
Most ever online: 102
Guests: 102, Members: 0 on Jan 30 : 09:42
Proudly powered by e107 Bootstrap CMS which is released under the terms of the GNU GPL License.

